<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baidu: Page not Found</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707</link>
	<description>Of China changing the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resignation of Baidu's CTO &#124; CHINAYOUREN</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19883</link>
		<dc:creator>Resignation of Baidu's CTO &#124; CHINAYOUREN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19883</guid>
		<description>[...] it would normally, as people will be quick to find connections with the Google China affair and the hacker attack on Baidu. Both are unlikely to have any relation with Li&#8217;s decision. The crisis in Baidu was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it would normally, as people will be quick to find connections with the Google China affair and the hacker attack on Baidu. Both are unlikely to have any relation with Li&#8217;s decision. The crisis in Baidu was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and China (3): Some updates &#124; CHINAYOUREN</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19876</link>
		<dc:creator>Google and China (3): Some updates &#124; CHINAYOUREN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19876</guid>
		<description>[...] right now. On the other hand, investors have little doubts about Baidu who is up 13,5%. I bet some copycat in the B offices is already starting to plot how to offer an online BDocs, BMaps, BCalendar, Bmail, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right now. On the other hand, investors have little doubts about Baidu who is up 13,5%. I bet some copycat in the B offices is already starting to plot how to offer an online BDocs, BMaps, BCalendar, Bmail, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What's up with Google in China &#124; CHINAYOUREN</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19875</link>
		<dc:creator>What's up with Google in China &#124; CHINAYOUREN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19875</guid>
		<description>[...] not significant in a day when the whole Nasdaq was down 1.35%. Note that Baidu fell 3.51% after my yesterday&#8217;s post, and probably the impact on Google will be seen today when the market opens. I am quite happy that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not significant in a day when the whole Nasdaq was down 1.35%. Note that Baidu fell 3.51% after my yesterday&#8217;s post, and probably the impact on Google will be seen today when the market opens. I am quite happy that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19488</link>
		<dc:creator>Uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19488</guid>
		<description>What with the CTO? Any news about him? Links?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What with the CTO? Any news about him? Links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19485</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19485</guid>
		<description>What about the CTO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the CTO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19477</link>
		<dc:creator>Uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19477</guid>
		<description>Yes, I wrote the blog a bit fast because it was breaking news. Since then I have been googling for this and seen that very similar attacks happened to Twitter and Google before, they said they were DNS attacks or redirect attacks, and similarly claimed that no security issue was involved. However, security in the broad sense  is to ensure that a hacker cannot stop the service of baidu, and also to &lt;em&gt;reassure&lt;/em&gt; the users that their data is secure. Whatever the technical reality of the attack, in these 2 main points baidu was seriously hit.

Anyway, I agree  the conclusions I draw are not necessarily warranted from this single attack. It is just that coincidentally I was reading the article &quot;Page not Found&quot;, and the temptation to connect the 2 events was too irresistible.  

But enough of this, let&#039;s turn our eyes to the exciting Google newsd and WTF is going on with that now, thanks for the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I wrote the blog a bit fast because it was breaking news. Since then I have been googling for this and seen that very similar attacks happened to Twitter and Google before, they said they were DNS attacks or redirect attacks, and similarly claimed that no security issue was involved. However, security in the broad sense  is to ensure that a hacker cannot stop the service of baidu, and also to <em>reassure</em> the users that their data is secure. Whatever the technical reality of the attack, in these 2 main points baidu was seriously hit.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree  the conclusions I draw are not necessarily warranted from this single attack. It is just that coincidentally I was reading the article &#8220;Page not Found&#8221;, and the temptation to connect the 2 events was too irresistible.  </p>
<p>But enough of this, let&#8217;s turn our eyes to the exciting Google newsd and WTF is going on with that now, thanks for the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707/comment-page-1#comment-19476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren-free.com/2010/01/12/2707#comment-19476</guid>
		<description>Baidu was hit by a domain name hijack. This is more like old school social engineering hacking than a security issue so I&#039;m not sure I really buy your assertion that concentrating on security would have helped.

The weakness here isn&#039;t so much the domain owners as the registrars. I myself use register.com and they&#039;re a very large outfit with a high degree of automation of transfers which leaves itself more open to this sort of thing. Although I don&#039;t disagree on the point about innovation, it&#039;s really quite sad to see how big Chinese sites like kaixin001 etc are blatant rip-offs of the original English-language sites.

This, I think, is rather more interesting:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baidu was hit by a domain name hijack. This is more like old school social engineering hacking than a security issue so I&#8217;m not sure I really buy your assertion that concentrating on security would have helped.</p>
<p>The weakness here isn&#8217;t so much the domain owners as the registrars. I myself use register.com and they&#8217;re a very large outfit with a high degree of automation of transfers which leaves itself more open to this sort of thing. Although I don&#8217;t disagree on the point about innovation, it&#8217;s really quite sad to see how big Chinese sites like kaixin001 etc are blatant rip-offs of the original English-language sites.</p>
<p>This, I think, is rather more interesting:<br />
<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
