Time

...now browsing by tag

The Time of Han Han (2) +Ulterior Rant

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Here is an update to yesterday’s review of Han Han, with some additional info about the Time nomination, which might be more important than it appears at first sight.

Then, if you stay till the end of this chapter, we will put on the yellow socks to analyze a bit more that terrible scourge of our times: the Ulterior Motives. This is for the benefit of all the puppet journalists and researchers who enjoy using that phrase, please pay attention.

The comments today come in the form of title-paragraphs, to allow for easy skimming:

1- The rules of the Time 100 are often misunderstood and heavily criticized, especially after internet star moot hacked the online poll last year and turned it into a joke. However, what you should keep in mind is that the internet poll only selects one of the members of the Time 100 list. That is, only the top person in the online poll makes it into the final official list, and in the position that Time editors decide. To be fair, it does make sense to include at least this one person from the poll, as it is representative of online mobilization power (when it is not hacked). Click to continue »

Posted in Internet and Media, Politics and Change | 3 Responses »

THE MINIYOUREN
- Kissinger and China by Jonathan D. Spence | The New York Review of Books
- The Jamestown Foundation: The Dragon and the Mamba: China’s Growing Presence in Mozambique
  Fascinating article (in spite of the title). For all the humanitarian blah-blah of the West, this single hypocritical action, the agricultural subsidies in our developed countries, has caused more suffering in Africa than all the Chinese factory supervisors ... if there is any hope for Africa, it will come from the BRICS.
- Why China’s left is up in arms - China Media Project
  Interesting article, but I think too optimistic. All this "debate" we are seeing is probably just a reflection of internal struggle for power in the run up to 2012. As soon as the seats are assigned and the match is settled, these "debates" will die out and the leaders will go on with their business. They are not ideological driven leaders, but mostly pragmatic. <br><br>Looking at it from a different angle: if somethings works well, why on earth would they want to change it? China is still growing at amazing speed, the PEW surveys show high levels of satisfaction, the miracle is still in full force. I don't believe for a second that Bo and the others want to return to Maoist politics in any meaningful way. They want to maintain the status quo, and to increase their own power, that's all.
- Book Review - On China - By Henry Kissinger - NYTimes.com
  Interesting article, and a good warning by an old fox. This idea of a "next cold war" has been worrying me for a while, it is not at all impossible we end up that way.
- Shanghai Scrap » Ring Them Bells: Dylan Wasn’t Censored.
  And I agree.
FEEDSTREAMCOMMENT
America Baidu Beijing bloggers Books Business censorship characters Charter 08 crisis culture development economy education Europe expat GFW Google history Human Rights humour internet language law mandarin Mao media misunderstanding Obama photo politics protest religion review Shanghai speech taxi translation travel TV ULN unemployment university Wen Xinhua
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Categories
Recent Comments
UserOnline
8 Users Online
Most Viewed
Books in Review
China Blogroll
China Intelligence
Language Thursdays
Translator
CONTACT
The contact form is temporarily disabled. To contact me you can write an email to my namesurname at gmail.com. Make sure you spell that properly.
Xinhua says:

Powered by WordPress | © 2012 CHINAYOUREN | A DesignyourWeb, WordPress Hacker & ULN Experience